Survey of cryoprecipitate production and cryoprecipitate and fibrinogen concentrate utilization in North America: Variable practices observed from July 2016 to June 2021, The BEST Collaborative Study

Authors: Lu, W; Singh, U; Rochester, Minnesota; Poisson, JL; Shih, AW; Raval, JS; Grandoni, J; Jacquot, C; Germain, M; Dunbar, NM; Cohn, C; Young, P

Affiliations: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. American Red Cross, Washington D.C., USA. Wing-Kwai and Alice Lee-Tsing Chung Transfusion Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, USA. Vitalant Medical Affairs, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. Department of Pathology, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA. Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Division of Laboratory Medicine, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA. Héma-Québec, Québec City, Canada. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. American Red Cross, Washington D.C., USA. Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Publication: Transfusion; 2025

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Cryoprecipitated antihemophiliac factor (cryo) is primarily used to replenish fibrinogen in acquired coagulopathy. Little has been reported about its usage patterns within hospitals with respect to patient population, frequency of use, and dosing. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cryo production and usage data were collected over 5 years from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2021, from nationally based blood collection centers in the United States (U.S. n = 2) and Canada (n = 2) and from eight large academic hospitals, respectively. Usage data for a similar product, purified fibrinogen concentrate were also collected from four hospitals. RESULTS: Two U.S. blood collectors reported increases in cryo production normalized to total whole blood collections from 17.4% in 2016 to 22.3% in 2021 and from 16.4% in 2016 to 20.2% in 2021. In contrast, in Canada cryo manufacturing increased slightly in one region (11.3%-12.9%) and decreased (8.0%-2.0%) in the other. Cryo utilization, defined as numbers of patients treated normalized to the inpatient census, and dose administered per patient did not consistently increase and differed significantly between hospitals participating in the study (p < .0001). Likewise, the departments that most frequently transfused cryo varied between hospitals. Similarly, variations in practice were observed for fibrinogen concentrate usage. CONCLUSION: While much of Canada and Europe have moved towards using fibrinogen concentrate, two large U.S. collectors have increased cryo distribution. The lack of standardization and variability in the clinical practice regarding the use of cryo and fibrinogen concentrate reported by study sites may be attributable to practitioner preference, availability, and/or cost rather than adherence to published evidence or guidelines.